Thoughts on #ShirtStorm

This blog post should have been about the amazing human achievement of landing a space probe on a comet that moves at 40,000 mph and is located hundreds of millions of mils away from earth. Instead, it is about a nasty woman named Rose Eveleth, a woman who got her panties in a wad when Matt Taylor, an astrophysicist who was part of the team that landed Philae on the comet, wore a T-shirt that was made by one of his friends.

In a nutshell: a brilliant scientist wore a T-shirt made by his friend (a woman, for the record) when he was taped on the biggest night of his life.  It’s a Hawaiian-themed shirt with ’50s-style cartoons of women in bustiers who are shooting guns.  It’s fun and lighthearted, although not exactly professional.  But hey, when you land a rocket on a comet, you can wear whatever you damn well please.

Not all see it this way.  Science journalist Rose Eveleth tweeted out comments about how the T-shirt makes women unwelcome in STEM and “ruined the comet landing” for her, thus turning the EDS achievement into a Rose-Eveleth pity party. Matt Taylor was forced to make a tearful, blubbering apology, which wrecked the greatest week of his life. (It is worth noting that Eveleth is a science writer precisely because she sucks at doing actual science.  In an interview with Scientific American, she said, “It really wasn’t until college when I was studying abroad and doing research that I realized I’m just not a very good scientist. I didn’t really care as much about the data as I did about the stories I could tell about it. “) Feminism doesn’t have to be this way, kids.

Back in 2005, Larry Summers made a comment about women in science in which he opined that women were inherently not as good at science as men are.  MIT professor Nancy Hopkins, a preeminent biologist, stormed out of Summers’ remarks in fury.  At the time, it felt like I had been kicked in the stomach: it is incredibly crass to tell people who have devoted their lives to doing good science that their actual achievements are less important than Larry Summer’s back-of-the-envelope calculations on women’s inherent abilities.

Rose Eveleth just told Matt Taylor the same thing: his amazing achievement doesn’t matter as much as her twitter feed. It is a pathetic, anti-meritocratic attack on a world-renowned scientist by a mediocre mind who can’t get jack done in a lab.  It was wrong when Larry Summers did it, and it was wrong when Rose Eveleth did it.

A few years ago, Mr. Velociprator’s ex-girlfriend (a woman who thinks that being a games journalist makes her a bad-ass STEM professional) said something similar to me.  She asked me repeatedly whether or not I thought that my boyfriend’s mother was “intimidating.”  When I said no, why would I, this so-called “feminist” replied with a sugary smile, “Because she’s an engineer.”

“I’m an engineer, too,” I replied.  She told me it was “different” because Mrs. V had been a rocket scientist.  I was then treated to five minutes of this “feminist” in “STEM” who advocates for “women in tech” denigrating my work on the NASA space elevator.  This was two years ago, and I still can feel the sucker punch from a woman who had never taken college-level science, let alone spent her formative years in a lab doing nanotechnology.

Feminism is losing because it’s now about mediocrity, not a meritocracy.  A meritocracy doesn’t care about Matt Taylor’s ’50s-sci-fi pinup T-shirt; it cares that he landed Philae on a comet.  As Nancy Hopkins and many women like myself can attest to, that is the only route forward for women’s equality.

Advertisements

7 Comments

Filed under Feminism, Science & Engineering

7 responses to “Thoughts on #ShirtStorm

  1. Youre very insensitive. That shirt should be charged for sexual assault. I think you are a patriarchal apologist. Smh.

  2. feminisminhd

    I think the flip side of the argument is that you can’t just let someone wear something which objectifies women because there achieved something. Otherwise we would be living under a tyranny of the achieved. No one is superior to another. That’s what feminism stands for.

    • bridget

      Wow, I’m not sure you understand what you just said, but Stacy McCain would be proud of you for equating feminism and Marxism.

    • feminisminhd

      Never did I say I personally held those views, I just thought you should acknowledge the other side of the arguments rather than ignoring it.

    • bridget

      Then what are your personal views?

      And do you understand that a lot of my post was about how getting all judgy about stupid stuff hurts actual woman scientists?

  3. Matt

    Loved your post very interesting and great to read a balanced piece of writing. I have never felt so saddened to learn that people attack each other so viciously and without checking facts on twitter a SJW ( Social Justice Warrior) sadly has more rights than everyone combined Women are shouted down for disagreeing. I nearly deleted my twitter profile over this as I felt a great deal of anger. ( okay enough of a rant) thanks for writing it.

  4. Pingback: HSV Eraser Review: Can Christiane Buelher's System … | Herpes Survival Kit

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s